1
Welcome everyone
Simon Rosenberg, Opium Chronicles
Um, you know, have a what's going to be an interesting event today
I thought this is going to be just Stuart Stevens and I reflecting on the amazing election we had last week
Um, but we have other things to talk about today
Welcome, Stuart
Thanks for joining me today
Great, great to be here, man
What the going on with these Democrats
Huh
I want to start by doing the the obligatory
We had a great election last week
It was one of our best elections we've had in a long time
Certainly since 2020, maybe 2018
There was a clear message of repudiation of Trump
There was really no, you know, sometimes, Stuart, elections are complicated and they send nuance messages
This one was not complicated
This sent a clear and rousing uh message of repudiation against this uh against Trump and his rancid regime
Um and then here we are a week later uh in a different place and you know we had a big win Tuesday
We did not have a big win last night uh when eight Democratic senators made a decision to join with the Republicans to reopen the government against really the wishes of the American people frankly and most of the Democratic party
But here we are and um do you do you want me to take the first stab or do you want to I mean is this like one of these things where they're trying to cover the spread and win by too much
I I think listen I um I I I think that we have to take what they're saying at face value that they believe they were doing the right thing and that they were protecting tens of millions of Americans from harm from Trump
And I think that part of in in our Chamberlain Yeah
Yeah
I understand
And I said, you know, the sentiment is correct, the analysis is incorrect
I disagree with it
Um, and they um, you know, I I think this was a mistake
And I think it was a mistake because there are two lessons that we have to always learn from our battles against autocrats, which is that if you appease, if you give in, they take more
It just it's an incentive
They see you as as weak
Um, and and the second one is that, you know, I think that in some ways, you know, in in the Hobian community this morning, I had a second point, but I'm forgetting
But let me get to what I was going to say anyway, is that I'm a little like everybody, I think a little frazzled today
I was expecting to have kind of a calm, joyous, celebratory victory lap week uh from our election
Not really working out that way
But I think the other thing that hap you know that's come up in our conversation at Hopium today is that you know was this always the outcome and and going to was it this was was this always going to be the outcome once Schumer and Jeff decided I think courageously to take this on back at the end of September early October and I think the answer to that is no because I don't I don't buy the idea that the likely scenario here is that Trump would start shooting the hostages
I mean, it was always a possibility, but also Donald Trump is a deal guy
You know, he's negotiating deals with foreign leaders all over the world
He seems uninterested in negotiating to, you know, to help the American people and to help our democracy
And I think that part of what motivated these the gang of eight yesterday to take their action was the sense of increasing harm that was happening and they wanted to protect the American people from harm
I don't I think this was a shortterm I don't agree with the decision as you pointed out, but I also think this is this was being done out of a virtuous sense and not one of that capitulation
But I I I do think that Stuart, going back to something you and I have discussed a lot in our regular conversations, the Democratic Party is still in a confused place about strong and weak
Yeah
and and you know and about strong leader weak leader kind of stuff in our politics
It's it's just too secondary to how we look at politics every day where it's primary for Trump and the Republicans
And you know this has also got to be I think a big lesson coming out of what happened in the last few days
Yeah
Look, um I think a couple of things
One, I think it's fair to say that Donald Trump will always have a higher pain threshold when it comes to other people because he basically doesn't care, right
I mean, if you said to Donald Trump, you know, in 16, you'll get to be president, but you have to offer up one of your kids as tribute
His only response would have been, could I pick the kid
Right
Which one
Yeah
Which one
Um, and I I agree with you that I think this is well-intentioned
Um, and ultimately I, you know, I always go back to this back in my political consulting days
In two months, will it matter
Um, and I think that the larger trends that we saw on Tuesday, last Tuesday, were will dominate this moment that you had, you know, it sort of goes back to what is your theory of the 24 election
Republicans announced that this was a realignment election and that there this was going to be a before time and an after time
Well, that always seemed ridiculous to me
Uh Trump's coalition in 20 was 84% 85% white
It dropped to 84% white
And it was an election that a challenger should have won and did win
That's not an endorsement
And so if you go back to just compare the exit polls for the Virginia governor's race to the exit polls in the uh presidential race, you know, you you're back to the black lieutenant governor candidate got 7% of the black vote
That's exactly the same that Barry Goldwater got in 1964
So that's about as flat a line as you can get
Um, you had Hispanics supporting a Republican dropping to 32%
Which really should be no surprise
You know, in Bush where we really worked at this, we got it up to 42, but then with McCain, it went back down to like 32
And it wasn't like McCain was out there saying they're a bunch of rapists and we're going to deport their asses
Um, and uh, Asian-Americans, back to 70%
So, um, I think and winning young men Um so you know I I think that the ugliness of what's happening in the country is very does reach people does resonate with people probably particularly younger voters and I think the fact that nothing has gotten better
I mean his one issue that he's winning on was immigration and he's losing on immigration because they overplayed their hand
So, you know, like Haley Barber used to say, at a certain point in politics, it's good to be with something people like
And, you know, I really don't know what Republicans are for that they like, except, you know, you shouldn't have transgendered athletes in the podiums, which is not an international winning issue
Yeah
Look, I let me try to give my summary here of this moment in in twofold
One is that and I agree with everything you just said
I think number one is that um the elections went way beyond anything that we could have anticipated
I mean, you know, seeing 20 point margin wins in Pennsylvania and in Maine uh and in Georgia and in California on these statewide ballot initiatives and various elections was extraordinary
I mean, you just don't see 20 point margins in competitive states
And these are places that the Republicans fought
It wasn't like they just gave up
I mean, these were these were contested races where Democrats had enormous margins
We had enormous margins in New Jersey and in Virginia
And the margins here really matters to me as somebody who's been doing this is that this wasn't just a win
It was a route
It was a clear repudiation
It was a legitimate blue wave that washed all across the country
And we all know to your point that if you game this out over the next 12 months, the likely scenario now heading into the midterms is that something like this is replicated next year just based on historic trend lines when you have this kind of definitive movement
And as I've talked about how in the in the generic ballot, we've moved seven to eight points since last year
In the Gallup party ID, we've moved 12
you now see Senate races that are the the reach Senate races for us that we need to win uh the Senate and flip the Senate
In Alaska, we're up in Ohio
We're up in Maine
We're up
Um in Iowa, we don't have a candidate there, but our gubernatorial candidate is up
In Texas, you know, our candidates are within margin of error in competitive races
And all of a sudden, you see the evidence of this shifting landscape, you know, of it moving 7 to 12 points
you can now see it in the state-based polling for 2026
And so this is a cycle of opportunity for us
But I think the second thing, Stuart, I'll throw out there, and this is something I've been arguing since the summer, is that the shutdown was really only a piece of the battle over the budget and Trump's agenda
And now the Republicans have to with one of the smallest uh congressional majorities in American history where they can only lose two votes in the House and three votes in the Senate
They have to now defend the indefensible
They have to go into these bud these final budget negotiations to get us to a budget next year
And they have to defend the tariffs potentially
They have to defend the health care cuts
They're going to have to defend the increases in electricity prices because the the subsidy cuts to the clean energy clean energy subsidy cuts
They're going to have to defend this domestic police force that Trump and the tripling of the ICE budget
There is a lot in this final budget that is going to be very difficult for the Republicans to defend
And I think that one of the recommendations that I've been making is that once the government is reopened and checks start flowing again and SNAP benefits are there and the air traffic controllers go back to work, we need to make it very very clear about what we are not going to vote for at the end of the year and that because in essence I think we should attempt to to repeal the entire big ugly bill
That thing only passed with 50 votes in the Senate
They need 60 on all those same many of those same things
And I think we should make it clear that we're not going to give them those votes
And this would be a way for the gang of eight to redeem themselves, right
To show that they're not just appeasers and capitulators, but that they're they're doing there's a virtue to their their fight
Um, and I think what how much of that we can get in this budget negotiation or then in next year's budget negotiations or when we come back into power in 2027, we've got a clear set of things that we want to do
We should talk to the American people about it
Here are the things we want, right
Roll back the tariffs, fully fund ACA and Medicaid, you know, make sure that we're funding our allies in Europe and Ukraine and not Putin
That we're aligned with, you know, our allies and not Putin
that we are um you know we're not going to triple the budget of ICE
We need to draw a line in the sand now on what we're not going to vote for
Our Senate Democrats are not going to vote for and have let them continue to make the case for things that they can't really defend because I think they have two options now as a party
They either defend the indefensible and run on the most unpopular agenda in modern American history, one that's pulling much lower than he is frankly, or they start course correcting
And we began to see this desire for course correcting. 13 Republicans have called for the House Republicans to negotiate in the ACA subsidies
We just voted three times last week to repeal the Trump's terrible tariffs
And so they're aware that this agenda is unsellable to the unsellable to the American people and we have to keep pushing on both fronts, right
which is that we got to make them eat it
Because I think one of the reasons we had such a good election is that Schumer and Jeff by picking this fight made the major issues in our country about the harms they were doing to America
It wasn't about process stuff or anything else
It was about healthc care cuts and people's lives getting worse
There was this massive repudiation
We need to keep all that in the news, but we also now, I think, have to show a greater willingness to be resolute about what we're just not going to support in the upcoming budget negotiations
Look, I I couldn't agree more
You know, if I ran the Democratic party, if you what I would suggest is that they could take a pace in a contract with America and have a very specific, relatively short list of this is what you're going to get, which is is just a version of what you're saying
Yeah, that I would say you're going to get a tax on people who make over, pick a number, $10 million a year, whatever
Uh I would say that you're going to cut off all funding uh for the executive branch
I would say that I would say we're going to nationalize Starlink
We're going to nationalize SpaceX
And I would have these things out there that are big, exciting to people
um and say this is I I I want something I'm going to get here, you know
And to me, it's time for like a little trash talk
This is good
Like, you know, we won, you lost, we're better, this is why we're right, you're wrong, you're you're got routed
And so, you know, you combine that with one of the things that just really strikes me about the Republican party is who do they have out there who's not just loses losing them supporters every time they go on
I mean, they have Stephen Miller who is like a cartoon character
You have, you know, Christy Gnome
You have JD Vance who, I mean, if his own family is speaking to him at the end of this, it'll be astounding
I mean, the way that he attacks immigrants and the way he says you shouldn't like people who speak another language who move next door, like like maybe your in-laws, his in-laws, like really JD, I don't think they're that bad
I kind of like to meet them
I bet they're interesting
Um, and Trump and who who's out there
Who is their appealing figure
Um whereas, you know, I think both of these women who are elected governor are tremendously appealing
I think their backgrounds are very uh important
It goes back to claiming a national security edge
Um so, you know, it's it's you need a a combination of a messenger and message
And it seems to me that the advantage goes to the Democrats on both
Uh and I just hope they get it together
Whereas Schumer is not a plus
I mean, nobody looks at Schumor and says,"Great, I want that." I mean, it's just where he is in his career
It's probably who he always was
He was more of an inside player
Yeah
I don't think they react horribly to it if you're just It's just sort of wallpaper, you know
Um, and he has this Senate process talk
Uh, so you know, I would be out there trying to put all these other faces out there for the Democratic party and there's a bunch of them and they're really appealing from Cheers to Yeah
Well, governor of Virginia and New Jersey
Yeah
Look, I mean, I I think it's a great perspective, Stuart, that, you know, getting beyond the sort of the anger and the frustration of the last 24 hours to, you know, what I tried to do in my post today is to sort of level set on where we were and and I, you know, went through the polling, you know, the polling data showing Trump, you know, incredibly unpopular, his agenda even more so
I think the thing that is also going to start to become a much bigger topic of discussion is his clear physical decline and and that is you know become impossible to ignore
I mean the media is doing the best that it can to ignore it but you know him falling asleep for 20 minutes in the middle of a live event at his own desk you know that took place on Thursday you know was kind of an incredible moment
I mean, an unprecedented moment in our in modern American history to have, you know, he's sitting at the Resolute desk with a camera on him and he's asleep for 20 minutes
And, you know, and so I think that's going to become an issue
And I also think we we for all of the the obvious anger and frustration at the Democratic party that has played out over the last few months, the data about relative strength of the two parties over the last few months has moved dramatically towards us
I mean, not just in party ID and in the generic ballot where we're now substantially ahead of where we were a year ago, but we've now seen in virtually every poll Democrats have an advantage on the economy, which has was not been true, was certainly not true in 2024
I went back and looked, Trump beat us on the economy by seven points in the election last year
Um, and and I think that, you know, we are um structurally things are moving in our direction
And I also think you're absolutely right
I mean, if you look at our top 20 to 30 leaders to compare them to the other side, you know, they got nothing
I mean, JD Vance would have to shave his beard if he was in the military, right
Like, I'm still, you know, it's so funny that Hegath has waged a war on facial hair
Vance and obesity
Trump, his own two guys, wouldn't be able to make it in in the Hexath military
And so I do think that as we get through this I I just I want to come back to one kind of very foundational understanding that I have at the moment which is that you know we have we we have more power than we understand
We are still struggling to sort of step into our own power in this moment
But I think the real test of this moment and and our lessons that we take away, you know, from it because I remember the second lesson I was going to talk about now, which is that I do think that one of the reasons we did so well in the election as the American people saw us fighting for them, right
and that and that we now need to be fighting really hard over the next few months when the Republicans now have to come back again and get seven of our votes, you know, for any final budget that passes and and let's if they can't do that and we hit an impass again and they want to get rid of the filibuster, you notice they haven't wanted to get rid of the filibuster and they and the overt reason they've said is because when we come back into power, we would use it maliciously
But the real reason is then they have to own their own budget and pass it with their own votes, which I they barely were able to do on the big ugly bill
They only got to 50 on the big ugly
This thing is going to be far uglier the end of year final omnibus that's going to come and I don't know that they can pass their own budget with their own supporters given their low margins
And so I think they we have them in a much uh weaker place than I think is the conventional wisdom
And if I can sort of riff off of your give you my riff of the riff you went on earlier
You know we have to get up every day remembering that Trump is weak
He's not strong
He's losing
He's not winning
He's a failure
He's not a success
He's a villain
Not a hero
And and that we have to and he's I call him a big blubbery baby man and anything but a strong man
But we have to recognize that our job in part every day is to pull the curtain back from the wizard to remind the country that this orange emperor has no clothes
What an ugly sight that is
But it is critical that we recognize that the bubble is piercing
This bubble of strength is piercing
And I'll give you one other example, Stuart, of this, right
And this is something you'll appreciate
So, you know, I've been waging this war against these red wave pollsters for the last few years
So in New Jersey, the Red Waiverss came in and showed the race dead even
She won by 13 points
There were seven different Yeah
seven Seven different pollsters in the final 10 days with polls showing the race one or two points
They were off by more than 10 points, which as you know means either they can't poll or these were fake polls, right
And so those seven pollsters now have been also and a few others nationally have been consistently pumping out these polls showing Trump up six in job approval, up four in job approval, up, you know, even
So, there were a series of these national polls that Republicans were seeing that were telling them that everything was okay
That even though we know in the independent polling that bottom has fallen out on Trump's approval rating, these fake polls have been instrumental in in keeping Trump's congressional coalition together
Well, guess what happened
Emerson after the election dropped a poll showing Trump going from minus3 to minus 8
You had another one of their pollsters, you know, after the election moving from plus4 Trump to minus5 Trump
And all of a sudden, these red wave pollsters, what I call the wie, the blankie for Donald Trump and the Republicans, are now starting to show a more accurate window into where he is, which is that he's a despised and unpopular figure with an even more unpopular agenda
And this is a very important dynamic because it will start to loosen the already loosened hold that he has over Congress, you know, in these coming consequential fights
You know, let's see what happens
Yeah
And so anyway, I throw that out there
No, it's a really good point
People aren't talking about that
Um, you know, one one of the things I wish the Democratic party do is stop talking about the Democratic Party
It's like comics don't talk about how funny they are
They just tell jokes
You know, NBA sinners don't say, you know, I'm really tall
You like know that and you see it in action
And that's how you know, you've been in these presidential races and sometimes, you know, you're losing a primary
It's like nothing
You can't talk your way out of it
You just got to win the next primary
So, you know, they didn't nobody voted, I think, for the any a governor's candidate in any of these states, any statewide candidates to help save the Democratic party
They voted because they liked that person
and they voted because they didn't like the other one
They voted because they liked what they were talking about
And I think that just expecting anybody really to have very strong feelings about any party now is uh it's just sort of unrealistic
It's sort of an an outdated language
You know, it it it's just a classic case where I think society has kind of moved on and we have these things and we're going to have them for a long time and but it it uh they are who the people who represent them
That's who they are and they are what you're talking about
Um, so I don't know, you know, and and all of these polls, if if I was doing them to try to guide a candidate or party, you know, I I would ask a special question
Did Donald Trump lose a free and fair election in 20
And if you say no, I would throw you out of the poll because it just pollutes the sample because there's nothing that you can say to those voters that is going to mean anything
I mean it would be the equivalent of you know having a discussion about 911 and you go okay do you think it was an inside job if you say yes there's nothing you're gonna say like you know what so I think that these numbers get very I think Trump's numbers are actually worse than they look because you know what percent of those voters think that Trump won I mean they just live in another world
Um, and there's no equivalent on the on the uh center left side of that
Um, so look, I I you know, you have to I think it's always useful in these things to if you were sitting in the White House, painful as I thought is, what would you do
It's an interesting question because you know change the subject admit change to what though right I mean I I I don't know you know they were talking about making crime this huge issue I I I just I crime is always a difficult issue that if people aren't fearful you know and and I don't know um crime Listen, crime and immigration is Willie Horton, right
I mean, it's still the same kind of exploitation, racial fear
It's the core kind of, you know, the the comfortable place for Trump and even the modern Republican party to go
It manifests itself differently every two years
It has different ways that it appears and manifests
But I I think this point you're making about what do they do is really really important because when you look at polling now, you know, Trump's in the low 40s, right
He's down, you know, somewhere in the low 40s
His disapproval is up in the high 50s, but when you look at the major issues that people are voting on or the issues that really matter, he is consistently now in the low to mid30s
Yeah
So it means that essentially twothirds of the country is not rallying behind his major stuff
It's much bigger than Yes
than than his approval rating
And the problem for the Republican candidates is they have to run on that agenda next year
And Republicans just ran on that agenda all over the country and failed miserably
And I think the second thing, Stuart, and I'd love your reflection on this a little bit, is as somebody on the Republican side, is that if you're a Republican candidate in 2026, you just watched the leader of your party basically throw every 2025 candidate completely under the bus, um, didn't campaign for them, didn't spend a dime of his $500 million in his political account for any of these candidates, did things to actually actively make it harder for them to win, like the government shutdown and the cancelling of the the tunnel into New Jersey
And you're looking around, you're like, "This guy doesn't give a about me in my race
He actually this redistricting they did in Texas has cost a bunch of Republicans in California now their seats
If they do, if we continue to redistrict, they're going to be other Republican House members who will now be basically their political careers will be over
It's going to be interesting to see how they approach voting with Trump over the next 12 months given that, you know, their political careers are now over
And I'm just wondering if you could comment on as somebody who's worked in the House and Senate races, what it means by Trump sort of delivering such a clear signal that he didn't really give a about any of the Republican candidates running in 2025
Well, you know, I mean, it used to be in the olden days, like 11 years ago, um that it uh certainly all all parties, Republican parties would would allow you to disagree like I don't I don't agree with the president on this
Um and you you could say that and you know, in in Bush world, Bush would just shrug
He didn't care
You know, he was you know what
He's like, "Okay, uh you know, I'm gonna go for a run." Um it and but you can't can you do that in Trump world and I think the answer is no
Um and I think that that is part of uh the manifestations of the party becoming an extremist movement versus a party
A political party by definition embraces a lot of different views
It it if it's a national party it has to
And you know, it wasn't that long ago that there were more Americans living under a pro-choice Republican governor than one who was against abortion because you had California, you had New York, you had Pennsylvania, you had Massachusetts
Um, and they were all pro-choice governors of one variation of another
Um, and now of course you that would be impossible
you couldn't win a primary
Um, and I think it's just the you have a party that has room for Andy Brashier and Mandami
That's that's a healthy party, I think
Um, and I don't see that uh in in the Republican party or the the ability to do it
Um maybe after they all get shellacked in 26 they'll do it leading up to the as a primary starts the day after that race
But I don't know
I mean I I I I think it's the Fouian bargain that the Republican party shook
And what people forget is Mesosphles not only doesn't take your soul, he doesn't deliver
You don't get what you thought
Um, and I mean, just think about this
This is just blows my mind
Think about this
The vice president of the United States, you had this sort of storm over these uh youngish, not they were not boys, Republicans or girls, Republicans who had this kind of Nazi love group chat room, right
Somehow the vice president of the United States thought he ought to go out and defend that
like just think of people working for him sitting in his office and he goes, "Look, guys, um I'm gonna go out and defend the Nazis." I don't know, man
Is that really like a smart idea
But he did it because he thought it would help him with the party because it would prove that he will be more transgressive than anyone else
There will be no enemies to my right
And if it means embracing a Nazi, so what
Nazis, dozens, dozens of Nazis
Nazis
Um, and I think it, you know, I mean, you look at this whole storm with the Heritage Foundation, which really, I mean, the Heritage Foundation has been corrupt for a long time
It's really not been important in Republican politics
I mean, I did all these Republican presidential campaigns
It Nobody ever cared about the Heritage Foundation
It was this sort of self perpetuating fundraising machine that paid a bunch of people a bunch of money and no one cared
But the idea that they still are seen as sort of an intellectual element of the Republican party and they have Tucker Carlson, you know, I mean, I don't know if you watch this guy, you know, he's got 911 truther films out there
He's broadcasting from Moscow
He's from having, you know, hanging out with Holocaust denying Nazis
and they go out and defend him
I mean, just like that is crazy
And you know, to the pimp people pay extent people pay attention to that
It's like no, I mean, where in America do you do that
You go to the reddest part of America
Go to I don't know the reddest state in Mississippi County in Mississippi and you wouldn't have somebody do that
He was like running for board of supervisors
You're not going to go out there and defend Nazis
Um, so I just think it just shows how lost they are
Um, and you know, the Republican party has never come to grips since in the '9s
You crime, welfare, taxes, Soviet Union
Okay
Crime went down, taxes went down
Clinton ended welfare as we know it, and we won the Cold War
So this was a dominant question we talked about in the 2000 Bush campaign
What does that mean
So we come up with compassionate conservatism which was never defined because of 911
And really the party has never redefined what that means
So you know McCain ran on sort of not being George Bush and on his own personality but there really wasn't a a policy framework there
And when Mitt Romney ran, I have to say, I mean, we had Mitt had very sensible kind of mainstream conservative policy ideas, but it didn't capture anybody's imagination, you know, and a lot of Republican voters just didn't care and didn't show up
And it took Trump going out there waving the bloody shirt to get them to show up
So, you know, a normal party would be asking itself kind of some of the questions the Democratic Party asked when it went through the whole DLC thing, like what is it that we are
You know, we've lost these presidential races
What is it
And yet Trump stops that, right
Because a threshold to advancing the Republican party is to say what a fifth grader knows is not true, and that is that that Donald Trump lost the election
It's it's a real uh conundrum that they're in that I think they're going to be in until Trump is no longer with it
Well, and JD, to your point, I mean, JD has so associated himself with the most extreme elements of Trumpism without having Trump's charm and and all the things that Trump brings
I mean, he's a remarkably unappealing political figure
um you know and only won one election before
He had not proven him yeah barely proven himself over time to be an effective politician
He comes off much more as a podcaster than he does as an elected official, you know, and and a commentator than somebody to be taken seriously
And I think that that I'm appreciating a little bit today uh your reminder of just these kind of structural trend lines that are of their weakening of their do not have a strong foreign team in the future having you know are now having to run on and defend the wreckage of the Trump era potentially for decades um that will come and how we are going through in fits and starts our own you know generation ational turn
I mean, we Nancy Pelosy's retirement last week was another sign that we're leaving the era of the Clintons and the Pelosis and the um and the Biden, you know, the Biden world and a new Democratic party is being built
And I think Stuart that one of the things that makes this moment you know in this moment of darkness today but as we shake it off and look forward that you know we are we have the opportunity now to go build the next thing and that next thing has a very strong set of leaders that are going to be leading us forward
We have an agenda, you know, I call it the three-legged stool agenda, which is affordability, healthcare, and, you know, threats to democracy, no kings that are is very strong and unifying
I mean, there was a lot of similarity in how all Democrats ran all across the country
And it's important I think if I can just add one more piece to my democratic friends is that I think it would be fil for us to believe that affordability is the only path forward or healthcare is the only path forward
I think it's all three
And I'll give you an example
California
Yes
I mean we're going to have a higher turnout in this ballot initiative than we had in the 2022 midterms
And this ballot initiative in California was about one thing and it was about Trump, right
It was about, you know, his it was it was no kings
It was anti-Trumpism
Newsome's ads were all about the harms Trump was doing to the country
Um, you know, we saw the huge turnout in races across the country
I think that there's this sort of weird internal discussion in the Democratic party about how we can only do one thing at a time
But of I know it's a weird thing, Steuart
We can of course we can say three things at a time because it's more appealing to more voters by the way if you're talking about things that are their top concern, right
I mean it well we've talked about this even when we used to try to pretend to focus people like having jobs and education it never worked and there were only three networks or something, you know, you could people just don't that's not how your mind works
You don't like well I'm only interested in like you know what's something called and you know affordability is just a repackaging of are you better off now than you were four years ago
Exactly
I mean there's nothing new about the idea that of you know it's the economy stupid
There's nothing new about that
Um it's just a different language
It's like from you know coaches telling you to drink water to telling you to hydrate
Well, I I can I tell you my favorite my favorite kind of I I feel like our family, the pro-democracy movement doesn't really have a rallying cry, right
And yet, we don't have a single and we may never have a single one
will have a series, but No Kings has been sort of the approximate and most popular one
But Mikey Cheryl stumbled onto something the other night that I loved it, which is which I'm also nominating as a finalist in the in the uh in the rallying cry competition, which was the New Jersey motto, which is which I didn't know before is liberty and prosperity
And I really thought that that in a very simple formulation really spoke to this moment
It spoke to obviously a moment over 200 years ago when New Jersey became a state
But I also I'm nominating that in addition to no kings as my is my f is one of my faves here is liberty and prosperity because it speaks to the desire to have freedom but also putting us not on the side of just lowering costs but putting us on the side of creating opportunity for people
Yes
and and which is where we have to be very careful as Democrats to make sure that we're for lower cost and opportunity
These are not at odds with one another
They have to be it's a both end, right
Um and and I think that Mikey Cheryl's campaign and I had her come on a few times
She just relentlessly talked about the opportunities that America had given her and her family, her service to the country um in this aspirational, this kind of very patriotic, you know, uh love of countrybased optimism and and about the future
I do think that we there were important things happened in and and and I'll I just want to be clear about the way I'm saying just to put an exclamation point in this and Stuart I want you to weigh in is that um I think that I come away from last week and I talked about this in a C-SPAN interview I did a few days ago sort of incredibly happy at the diversity of our wins and I and I think we have to really embrace the rainbow as I call it
We have to recognize that diversity is our strength
We had candidates that were able to win big time in different places all across the country
Um and and we won in ballot initiatives
We won in, you know, in the special uh election in California
We won a statewide vote in Colorado about feeding poor people
We won uh you know, we had more votes in the Miami mayor's race
We could win the Miami's mayor's race for the first time in 30 years, depending on what happens in this runoff
The party showed itself to be strong and diverse and capable of winning all different types of elections all over the country by large margins
To me, that's the big story here is that, you know, there isn't one true path for us
that there are many paths and that that this debate about our future, this building of this next thing, it's a process that we should view as being really exciting and giving us an enormous opportunity to build something better than what we had as we transition from the old Democratic party to the next one
Yeah
Listen, I I think purity tests are the death of parties because ultimately they always ratchet up and you end up being the vice president of United States defending Nazis, right
And that's, you know, he hasn't even really gotten started
I mean, what what's he going to call for
Cats and dogs
Cats and dogs, you know, eating cats and dogs
Where where do you go after defending Nazis, you know, you know, go to some memorial service, you know, for the SS
you know, um, and all of this I I I don't think we talk enough about race because all of this is being driven by the Republican party's realization that the country is becoming a minority majority party, which means it's becoming a more diverse country
And you, all the Steven Millers in the world aren't going to change that
So they're trying to fight against that, not by embracing it, not by trying to reach out to other people, but by trying to curate the vote to increase the percentage of the voters that they have, which are mainly white voters, will vote for him
Y and um you know, I I I think that that's just a sign of how weak it is
Um yeah, and I just wanted one of those guys
you know, this idea that if Ezra Klein was doing this thing, you know, about this problem that Democrats had with rural voters, I I I just would say just point out that in Mississippi, the counties that Harris did the best were the most rural
And why is that
Because they're black counties
And when you you you don't let yourself fall into saying rural voters when you really mean non-oled educated white voters because Staten Island wasn't Trump's best burrow because it's more agricultural than Manhattan
It's because where there's more white people and more non-olucated white people
Um and I I just think just as Trump never won workingclass voters
He won white working-class voters
Yeah
which is just sort of an extension of what you're saying is don't underestimate your strength
Um so uh look I think I think that's a good way to end my friend, right
I mean what you know don't underestimate our strengths and don't under don't overestimate theirs, right
I mean is there two sides of one coin
I think you know that that question you always ask yourself at the end of every day in a campaign
Would you rather be you know me or them
I I'd rather be the Democrats now
I think they have a lot stronger hand to play here
I think it's a great way to end
Stuart, it's always a pleasure to be with you
I get to host you sometimes, you host me sometimes
Uh you make me laugh
Uh which is important in this crazy business that we're in
And thanks for a little levity on what's been a tough day, I think, for Democrats
But I think this kind of coldeyed assessment from people who've been around a little bit that, you know, we've had a little bit of bump
We've had a bump today, but you know, we're on the right path
This is really important and so thanks for spending time with us today and bringing your wisdom
See you everybody
Take care
Listen, if you like this, hit like, share with your friends, and the most important thing of all, let's just keep fighting
Keep fighting for our country, for our future, the American people
Uh we got a lot of work to do
Um but we've had we had a tremendous election last week
Let's keep that in our hearts as we move forward and go win this thing together
Thanks all.
venmo
Venmo @Persona-Sight to donate in order to keep this site running ad-free
For immediate assistance, please email our customer support: [email protected]