Hastebin

> your demand for proof after shutting down concerns demonstrates the dismissive pattern, regardless of your intent.

Did you read what I wrote
> The precise point is to push the people away from these bold claims.

Reason included right above I said that.

> GitHub explicitly states that pull requests are cultural artifacts, not just technical submissions

This doesnt mean a PR has to be a fest of emotion. There is only little headroom for that. Some gratitude or concern is okay, the rest remains technical, which is precisely what came from my side in the PR. Liso spiraled into full emotion. You havent read the PR properly it seems.

> When you call work "inferior" while questioning if someone's "thinking too emotionally," 9 it destroys trust even when you're technically correct.
It wasnt called inferior at first. This was a word I had to resort to after using many other ways to describe it. Initially I mentioned how it can be done better and what it makes better from multiple viewpoints perspectives and explanations. 

> You're treating a discussion about communication as a technical problem to solve, not a human interaction to navigate

So do you. I reply to your comments, and so do you. So I dont know what you expect from me here.

> Actually, I addressed the pattern that multiple developers independently observed. Dismissiveness changes how people behave over time - people don't leave over single incidents, but from repeated experiences of feeling undervalued. 10 Your email to Liso calling his work "inferior" while questioning his emotional state 9 shows this is a consistent pattern.

There is no dismissal of neither anything liso nor you said. Reason in previous comment.
I did not call his work inferior, I questioned him if he would hypothetically merge something less superior over something more to get over the point of the technical and accurate situation. His emotional state was questioned waay before that multiple times, when he decided to insult and get emotional in the PR, pages before I presented the hypothesis at the ends of the emails. Nor would one email show a consistent pattern. For one youd need multiple which do not exist, therefore no pattern. Other "developers" is once again disproportiate. I have handled hundrets to thousands of PRs and 3 developers is simply the lound minority that failed to deal with a proper review. Liso left over a single incident too, there is no other, feel free to try to dig up any public comments or PRs as besides regular email exchange there is no other contact with liso with me and 99% happened publicly on GitHub. 

> Communication patterns don't magically change between platforms. 

Yes they dont magically, but they do. Paste chats of the PR and chats from here and find the difference out with chatgpt. Your communication patterns also differ in a club than an office too, so this is simply wrong.

> your Reddit communication mirrors your technical communication style

My technical communication style is formal and purely technical as best as possible and Reddit is far from mirroring it.  

> People stay when they feel valued, not just corrected

Above comment showed they were valued. How you effectively feel from that is not in anyones but their hand.

> when someone points out your communication pushes people away

Again you havent pointed out any specific communication that is part of the context outside of a single hypothesis that existed only after the entire ordeal. Your only other references are this Reddit comments, which are fully unrelated to the counterparty or on github.

> your communication style

My communication style was more than mostly proper and professional. Like you or someone here said, were humans and make mistakes, you do, counterparty does and so do I, so like any other heated review over pages, mistakes can be made. In this specific case the counterparty has made a magnitude more, but I did not react the same way like he did to the magnitude less from me. Therefore sharpshooting 1 word that was not even describing his work, but presenting a comparable hypothesis, says nothing about the communication style. Nor does dissecting like you said it, Reddit comments and claiming it reflects a professional environment.  

> it's simply where I'd normally suggest moving to a voice call
Voice is too much effort for me, text is easier for me.